Beyonce or No Beyonce?...

Although I can object to such comments made about Beyonce such as, "she is the most talented", or "she is the most beutiful" I must admit that she is VERY well- rounded. It seems that the disgust for Beyonce is not focusing on what her lyrics might say, but for her overall image in the media.Of course some people might idolize Beyonce more than they should, but you can't blame her for that; She is just doing her job.

And so what Beyonce is 27 still singing; And not neccessrily about the same thing she was singing about developing as a singer. I know that for a fact and you would too if you just paid attention to her albums growing up. And yea she is married,.. so what? She is not dancing in the videos to try and catch a man she already has. Again, choreography is just another part of her job, and I feel that she is very talented in that department. Too much attention is being put on her shaking her butt in a choreographed dance and being married, and not enough attention is being put on artist such as SNOOP DOG, who is too married but still chooses to have loose women dancing around him. Might I add that these women are not neccessarily dancing in a routine like manner either... which is usually what's considered acceptable in today's society.

Additionally, I don't belive that liking Beyonce as a singer makes me less of a person. I can and I DO like her, without depriving myself of self- respect. I also strongly feel that it all falls down on the audience who is watching these artists... and whether or not they can "think for themselves". And it's funny that India Arie, Alicia Keys, and Musiq were mentioned; cause I love all of them as singers as well. But that's the amazing thng about being able to take liking to different artist; they all have different characteristics that draw me to them.
BEYONCE DOES NOT MAKE ME; IT'S WHAT YOU MAKE OF BEYONCE!

Beyonce-itis: Global Epidemic by Raisa Tuzo

Is it me, or are the standards in today’s music industry greatly flawed? The other day my roommate and I were watching a TV One: Beyonce Special on television and to say the least I was not impressed with some of the comments being made about this girl.

One Journalist said, "She's the most beautiful, the most talented and she has the best guy." Another Journalist said, "If you don't like Beyonce, you don't like yourself." Really?! He stated it as if it we’re a fact... and it's not. The most talented? Who are we putting her up against exactly? Have any of these reporters ever heard of Michael Jackson? Whitney Houston? Luther Vandross? Patti LaBelle? Stevie Wonder? Karen Clark Sheard? Donny Hathaway? HELL... JAZMINE SULLIVAN?!?!

As far as people who don’t like Beyonce supposedly hating themselves...well, what a horrible thing to say. The same journalist said at the end "Beyonce represents everything that is pure and wonderful in the entertainment industry." REALLY?!?!!! Some of these comments are unbelievable to me because they make it SO obvious how blinded Beyonce has everyone. She is a great talent and has an amazing voice, yes. But I personally do not think she is everything the media makes her out to be. Beauty is relative in my opinion...so to label someone as the most beautiful is point blank, biased. Mind you, despite my disgust for her I can give her her props because the girl can perform like none other. Her shows are amazing, but when you really look at her behind the scenes, it’s a mess.

One, she is 27 singing about the same things she was singing about when she was 16. First negative. Two, you are married still shaking your behind in videos, (even though everybody knows that dance to single ladies lol). Three, her albums have consistently gotten worse with every new release. Critics and fans alike trashed “B’day” until “Irreplaceable” saved it. And this new CD, well I will just let the critics speak for me again...lol. Itunes has that averaging 3.5 stars...and it's steadily beginning it's fall on the charts...hmm. And four the girl is everywhere, it’s too much. Commercials, tv shows, music videos, movies… I mean REALLY??!

All everybody keeps saying is when you’re the best that's what happens. Beyonce to me is like a lyrical drug, not necessarily good but addictive. And the radios, ads and music channels are our suppliers. If we ingest it enough we eventually get addicted to it, and confuse this as liking it, when in reality were addicts. Now, for all Beyonce fans out there, once again I will admit that she can sing her tail off...but when you aren't SINGING ABOUT ANYTHING than I have a problem with you. When all you are making is bubblegum music, I can't live off of it because I am not being nourished anymore, I am simply tricking my stomach into thinking it's being fed when in reality it isn't.

When I listen to Jazmine Sullivan's cd I get fed. When I listen to Alicia Key's cd I get fed. When I listen to Musiq Soulchild, India Aria, JILL SCOTT I GET FED! Beyonce who??? She needs to sing about something real and than, and ONLY than will she get my respect. I love myself so that comment about not liking yourself if you don't like Beyonce is absurd... And for a reporter to say she is the best thing in the music industry I just don’t know anymore. If she represents everything that is PURE and WONDERFUL in the entertainment industry with her history of stealing other people's song, copyright infringement and lack of penmanship concerning actually writing songs, yet claiming she did...than I just don't know what has become of today's music industry. The only album that will move people 20, 30, 40+ years from now is Dangerously in Love and that's SAD for someone who has been in the music industry more than a decade... All I have to say is SAY NO TO DRUGS!!!! Just because something sells well doesn't mean it's good...

Please note, I do not expect everyone to love all of the same things that I like musically. I just want people to ask themselves is Beyonce really the best of this time? Maybe she is...and I just can't see it...or maybe in reality she isn't...

BLACK GREEKDOM

Is it me or has the importance or relevance of Black fraternities and sororities become more important than ever, especially in the AUC? Even more, has their influence and power at elite HBCUs like Morehouse, Spelman, Howard and Hampton changed what it means to a black college student? I think so; and interestingly enough, the one aspect that makes them important is their committment to service of mankind.

I am not Greek, but what I have seen is how much deferrence is given to Black greeks. For instance, SGA positions are filled with black and gold, pink and green, crimson and cream, purple and gold and blue and white. Why? There is something to be said of the correlation between being greek and being a student. Since most, if not all, fraternities and sororities seek to epitomize scholarship, committment to service, and the furthering of their respective founders' visions and missions, they in fact commit themselves to being professional, involved leaders on their campuses. That's why the "sphere of influence" continues to grow even to freshmen. Moreover, as a freshmen RA, I have had talks with freshmen who come to college with the idea of "crossing the burning sands into Greekdom." Why? They have seen an Omega hop or a Kappa shimmey? No, they aspire so early because they see the influence and relevance and wealth of opportunity with being greek.

I know some say being greek at HBCUs is counterproductive and in fact, the complete antithesis of brother and sisterhood due to its exclusive dynamic. Additionally, they opine that recent incidents of hazing on college campuses have tarnished the legacy and importance of greek fraternities and sororities. While I agree that the past "dark periods" in each organization's history go against their original purpose, their importance remains unchanged. In fact, their importance is increased to rebuild that which seemingly has been torn down. I see more Greeks doing community service, excelling in the classroom and going off after college with a network unlike any other moreso than non-greeks. They bequeath the traditional idea of black communal ties of family and cooperative self development.Thus, if the greater community benefits from the work of a brother or soror and one life is changed positively after encountering a greek, then the fraternity and sorority has served and fulfilled its goal.

While it goes without saying that not all greeks do well, for me the work I have seen them do with uplifting each other and the mission and vision of their respective founders' and institutions forces one to say: yes, Black Greekdom is more relevant than ever before.

So, will you be attending Spring '08 Rush?

Racism, Post Obama: Has Class Become the New Racism?

Commentary by Marquise
I was reading my friends about the President elect Barack Obama and the conversation
posed to me this entry. In my opinion, blatant racism is exists minimally amongst us. We as African Americans no do not have to worry about sitting in the back of the bus, or not being able to vote. One huge example of this land slide victory of president elect Barack Obama. Statistics show, although, African-American voters came out to vote in large numbers, many African Americans did not vote. Obama’s victory was because of white American voters who voted in the presidential election. However, even with the aforementioned, I believe racism exists in more passive ways and forms. For instance, an African-American well qualified advertising company gets turned down by a potential client for its white competitor because the client wanted they’re product to be appealing to everyone and not just minorities.

Today, class replaces race in being the top determinant of one’s socioeconomic
condition. Let’s take for example Will and Jada Smith’s children which of whom are
considered high class. They’re children are more likely to be more successful and better financially well off (independently from their parents) in any profession they choose than a white child whose father is janitor. Class is a big deals our society because it either offers or hinders networking opportunities, college options, career options and information in general. So while the African American boy from the projects of the Chicago can’t get a job, neither can the White boy from the trailer parks of the same city.

My President is Black...and I'm Proud!!!

I'm sure all of you are aware that last week on November 4th, Barack Obama was named Preseident-Elect. That whole night a group of friends and I watched as the state counts went up for both Obama and McCain. We were all so nervous because we voted for Obama and we wanted him to win. At 11:55pm, we all jumped up (in the restaurant we were in) and shouted for joy because we werso excited about Obama's victory. We couldn't believe that he had won finally!! The next day I recieved a chain email from one of the members at my church back home in California. It stated that Obama was a member of the anti-christ and that we as black people should be ashmed of ourselves if we voted for him. I was in shock to read this email, I couldn't believe that someone would actually say that about Obama. Wow. As I continued to read the email, the writer stated that because Obama supported gay rights, abortion, and supposedly silencing the truth, that he was against everything this country stands for. By having this statement, then it would be safe to say that the majority of political leaders are the anti-christ, because of their support. The writer obviously ignored all of the positive aspects Obama stands for and how he wants CHANGE within our country, specifically helping out the middle classes. I think this writer over analyzed Obama's postion to society. And although I am against those three things Obama supports, we cannot ignore all the positive things that Obama supports. I think Obama wants to be able to appeal and relate to everyone. He wants everyone in America to be happy. I can definetly say for certain that I am very happy that he is president, and I don't believe he is the anti-christ. P.S. MY PRESIDENT IS BLACK, AND I AM PROUD
-Whitnee Goins

Is No Child Really Not Left Behind? By Farrah Shelly

The No Child Left Behind Act is hurting more than helping. Sadly, NCLB doesn't care about strong relationships in the classroom; NCLB cannot measure smiles, teamwork, or the overcoming of adversity. It doesn't allow for creative and authentic assessments and engaging activities in the classroom. The only thing that seems to matter, from the state superintendent down to the district office and the school administration, are Standardized Testing and Reporting data. As a result of the federal government's industrial approach to education, certain schools must improve test scores in every major core class-math, history, science, English-and at increasingly high rates. Additionally, every student subgroup-including white, Hispanic/Latino, African-American, Asian, socially/economically disadvantaged, English language learners, special education students-must meet these yearly growth targets regardless of any obstacles. The tests must be taken by 95 percent or more of the students in each subgroup. If just one subgroup fails to meet the performance or test attendance standards of NCLB, the school is put into "program improvement." Moreover, these growth targets must be met or exceeded for consecutive years. .
NCLB is not only impacting certain minority populations; unattainable goals of NCLB are cutting across distinctions in class and race as more and more schools are being labeled as "failing schools." Additionally, in just five years all students in all schools in every state in the nation must pass their standardized tests at a "proficient level." That's right; 100 percent of all students must be proficient by 2014. No Child Left Behind has not been adjusted in any way to fit the reality of education. .
At the local level, we can do something even more important. Educators, administrators and parents can breathe life back into education. We can and must re-emphasize the joy of learning, the rewards of teamwork, the unique qualities of performance, animation, humor, role-playing, individual and group-based projects, and the overall life skills, relationships and memories that students and teachers are exposed to every day in a truly high-quality classroom within a school that cares. After all, students are still kids. They must have fun and they must want to learn in order to compete, collaborate and achieve beyond secondary and post-secondary education. SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!

Is It Really Necessary To Ban Gay Marriage? by Justine Burke

One of the most controversial issues of our time deals with homosexuality and whether or not to legally recognize same-sex marriages. Previously, the California Supreme Court had ruled that same-sex marriages were a constitutional right to be given to those who wanted it; however, on November 4, 2008, California voters voted yes on Proposition 8, which over turned California Supreme Court's ruling, and banned same-sex marriages in the state.

But, is it fair to let voters decide what lifestyles others in society can live? Why is it constitutional to permit a voter who is dead-set against homosexuality decide whether or not two men or two women can engage in a legally honorable marriage?

It is my personal belief that gays and lesbians should be allowed to marry and enjoy the same benefits that come with a heterosexual marriage. To me, banning same-sex marriages coincides with the fact that interracial marriages (marriages between blacks and whites for the most part) was once banned in the U.S. Why should the courts and government have any say in what one chooses to do in his/her own personal life? Love knows no limits or boundaries and therefore if one does not agree with homosexuality or same-sex marriages, one has failed to realize that IT IS NOT THEIR LIFE TO LIVE! How will the marriage of Tom and Bob affect your everyday life? IT WON'T! Tom and Bob just want the same rights as Suzie and Jim (i.e. insurance, tax, ownership purposes, etc...).

Opponents of same-sex marriage usually argue that same-sex marriages go against religion or that such marriages will teach children that homosexuality is ok. For one, not all people are Christians, and for that matter, not all people are religious. Christians tend to use the argument that homosexuality is wrong and that marriage is reserved for only a man and a woman because "the Bible says so." And while this may be true, the Bible also "says" that one shall not engage in fornication (nor mark thy body with tattoos because the body is "a temple"), and undoubtedly large numbers of "devout Christians" have done so. Furthermore, the Bible says that no one sin shall not be held above another, meaning that no one sin holds greater weight than another. Therefore, the argument of these so-called "devout Christians" is invalid unless they have never sinned in their lives, which is unreasonable to think.

Others believe that the legalization of same-sex marriages will bring children to believe that homosexuality is right. Who are you to judge what is right and what is wrong? Heterosexuals and homosexuals alike will one day have their own judgement days where their actions will be judged as to what was "right" and "wrong" that they did in their lives. The union of same-sex couple will not make children believe that one sexual preference is better than another. NEWSFLASH! Children know what it means to be gay or lesbian and I believe that people are born gay because I do not believe that people would "choose" to be gay if they knew what kind of hate and ridicule they would endure; therefore, if it was their destiny to be gay, then that is what will happen. In addition, gays and lesbians are born from heterosexual couples! You cannot hide homosexuality from anyone- it is blatant in our society and people will inevitably do whatever they want to do.

Although it will take many years, maybe even decades for same-sex marriages to become legalized in states (especially the South aka the "Bible Belt"), it is my hope that one day it will. People need to realize that gays and lesbians are people too and they cannot control the emotions that they are born with or with whom they fall in love. So what if Tom and Bob want to get married? Who is to say that they wouldn't have a more stable and loving marriage than any other heterosexual couple? After all, in this day-and-age more than half of all heterosexual marriages end up in divorce, which destroys the sanctity of marriage, just like some think same-sex marriages will.

-Justine Burke

Is the Media to Blame?

by Shana Childs
It seems that almost any major event, personal choice, and anything in between is infuenced by the media. As major agent of socialization, the media is a force to be reckoned with. However, at what point do we start taking responsibility in our own lives? I think that the media is an easy cover up for the lack of responsibility of adults. Furthermore, the media is a business, not a tutor or a parent or a preacher. Blaming the media for real problems will not lead to solutions because it is not the cause of these problems. Admitting the problem is the first step towards resolution. Please, stop blaming the media.

And the Count Down Begins by Christina Taylor

Well there are literally only hours left before the next president of the United States is elected (or selected...please forgive my sarcasm). Of course I am anxious and a little apprehensive because any way this election goes, chaos can be started. I am a lot worried about the less educated Americans that exist in our society, the ones that don't believe that government was created for the people by the people. The ones that vote (and haven't voted in years) and then on Tuesday, November 4th are completely disappointed about the outcome of the election. Let's be completely honest here, the nation is looking for a change in government but differs on who can actually bring about that change. As two very viable candidates compete for office my major concern is not only who wins but how the nation will react to who wins.
I was serious in class the other day when I stated that I will not be leaving my dorm on Wednesday, and I have good reason not to want to. Though America has seen some change and progress in regards to race relations, the prejudices in our society are still very obvious though they might not be blatantly expressed. Yes, if you haven't figured it out by now I am referring to the race riots and other dubious acts our country enjoys so much. Call me cynical, call me scary but I am not leaving campus, let alone my dorm until the shock has subsided and business can go about as usual.


Response By Destinee Moore

Assuming that the claim of this argument is that this years election will bring about chaos regardless of which candidate is elected. This chaos is listed as riots that will occur after the winner is announced. This seems to be a fallacious argument. Its make a hasty generalization that citizens will engage in riots based on either presidential candidate being elected. This conclusion is based on insufficient evidence because the argument does not list detailed proof of the matter. Also the argument is guilty of false analogy because it is merely descriptive and doesn't offer proof that links the assumed riots to the election of either candidate. The argument would be more effective if it offered more detailed information of past situations that are similar.

Depression in College Students

By Destinee Moore

Depression and suicide are issues that have been prevalent across college campuses for years. During their college years, students experience depression on a large scale. Many times in college, students experience true independence for the first time, and are ill prepared for that experience. Students have more trouble dealing with financial issues, relationship conflicts, and academic problems without their authority figures more regularly available. These factors often lead to serious cases of depression and suicidal thoughts in college students. Colleges can take many precautions to help students cope with these issues, such as psychiatric services and more financial opportunities for students.
Virginia became the first state in 2007 to pass legislation that bars public colleges and universities from punishing or expelling students "solely for attempting to commit suicide, or seeking mental-health treatment for suicidal thoughts or behaviors." Students should not be punished for seeking help with stressful issues. This adds to students’ reluctance to seek aid in coping with their issues. The new legislation suggests that institutions have a basic duty to prevent student suicide. This opened the doors for school to face more lawsuits for students who committed suicide from depression at their institutions. An institution can be held liable if the court determines that it somehow caused the suicide.
Counseling and suicide preventive services should be regularly made available by college and universities, yet the college/university should not be held responsible for a students’ depression or suicide attempts. Regular services to help students cope with depression will lead to safer and healthier environments for students. Colleges should help promote healthier living for students but are not responsible for student’s depression. Any services that promote safer and healthier experiences for students should be implemented on college campuses.



Response By: Charise Patterson
There is no doubt that depression is often overlooked in our communites, specifically regarding our genreation. It has become taboo to speak upon and not really looked at as a "disease" more so as a disfunction. This causes many teenagres to leave their depression untreated and ignored only making problems worse. But it is not the responsibility of colleges to fix nor suffer from this personal problem. Families, friends, and the individuals should hold this stand; not the school which the individual attends.

Though a college is your place of residence for four years, it is not your home. The institution sereves to educate and that is it's main purpose. Most universities to educate their students upon mental and physical health issues. But "promoting" healthy living is in no way the institutions job to do. Students get stressed about school works, social problems, and extra cirriculars. This stress can lead to depression. But these are stress factors that student controls, not the school.

Depression is very serious, and if a student approaches a counselor at most istitutions about the depression they will be referred to someone who can accurately help them. But if the school can be blamed and possibly punished for the suicidal actions of a depressed student, it is common sense that they would want no part in fixing the problem. Colleges and universities would much rather stay out of it.

I don't look at this as being wrong or uninvolved, it is simply the best and safest measure for schools to take. No one wants blood on their hands, and when it comes to the depression of college students the college should have no part in it.

Re:Interracial Dating

K.Haley

I do believe that there is only one race, the “human race,” but from a Socio-historical perspective society has polluted that notion. The color of one’s skin has bought division amongst human beings, by judging others worth by the color of their skin. Interracial dating can be the cause of tension in relationships, and can be a reason for being social outcast. We would all like to believe that everyone has accepted the idea of interracial relationships, but I think society still has some maturing to do. NO, we should not judge others by the color of their skin; we should choose our mates by the content of their character. But being colorblind is easier said than done.

In the movie, “Something New” Sanaa Lathan, falls for a white man, but it was not willingly. She is apprehensive about the idea, solely because of the color of his skin. Once in a relationship, their continues issue was dealing with their racial difference, and the lack of acceptance by friends and family. Those issues eventually lead to the break-up of the couple. Thankfully, Sanaa was mature enough to overcome those superficial differences and found that true love does not have a color. But it was not until after she endures heart ache and pain. But, not everyone is able to work past those racial differences!

Dating outside of ones race, is a personal decision. One that should not have to be contemplated, but in today’s society, often is. Being in a relationship between two individuals, and them being happy with each other. And who’s to say you can only be happy with a same-race person?



Response by Christina

Dating outside of one's race is stigmatized because of the way Americans have been socialized. Due to different social issues (i.e. slavery and segregation) the idea of being able to date outside of one's race and it be acceptable is rather taboo. Though race is an uncontrollable aspect, who you date is and dating outside of your race will not eliminate racial tensions but instead it will cause an uneasiness between the couple; and when out in public people will frown and make judgments about that couple based on preconceived notions of who should date who.Though looking through a rose colored glass is ideal, the truth is America is not ready to face the idea of intermixing different races. It is seen as more of an insult for an African American male to be dating a Caucasian woman then is the opposite. Think about. How often do you see an interracial couple, and think dag she is taking all of our good men. I mean from the statistics we hear most of our black men are dead or in jail, we don't want to loose the rest to other races. I think one reason we think like this is because essentially if all black men dated white women then how would our race continue? One reason that white people think this way is because they have been conditioned to believe that black men are inferior to white men and should not be allowed to touch "the pure white women". Unfortunately, there is some merit to both statements. Though there are colleges like Morehouse College, that is only a small microcosm of the real world. In reality there are LIMITED black well educated black men suitable for marriage. After watching the documentary, "Black in America" I came to realize that interracial couples still have it hard. Not only are they subjected to a life of uneasiness but they also subject their children to being discriminated against and also to having identity crisis. Seeing how the white man, in the documentary, had to essentially leave his family alone in order to marry his black girlfriend shows an important thing. Even in 2008 with all of the "perceived progress" that America has made, we still can not date outside of our race, and thinking that doing so will relieve racial tensions is very ignorant and uninformed. Honestly, love SHOULD NOT be limited by the color of one's skin but in ALL HONESTY IT IS. Maybe one day we will be able to accept interracial couples because we won't look at race, but that day has yet to come.

The Message in the Music

by Shaunicie Fielder

Music is one of the most diverse, fluid forms of communication known to man. Music has the power to transcend all barriers of time, space, and language. Some of the most popular music in the world is sung by people who barely understand the language. For many, music serves as a release or an escape for the shackles of everyday life. But for some, music has become a source of pain and strife. Rap and hip hop music have become two of the world's most popular forms of expression. Yet since their infancy, the two have come under fire for their harsh lyrics and violent imagery. Most notably in the Black community, there has been heated debate over this art form for its misogynistic portrayal of women and glamorization of illegal activity. Many artists have shunned criticism that they have received from the community and tried to pass the blame along to everyone from parents to record labels. There are many factors that influence the negative impact that rap and hip hop have had on the community, however the solution must begin and end with the artists that make the songs.

Rappers must take on a sense of personal and community responsibility when they make music. Although they may write songs about drugs and crime as a way to communicate a fantasy, the bulk of their listeners cannot make this distinction. Children are impressionable and absorb much of what they hear in songs. Music is one of the most important mediums for education because it facilitates learning. Even older people hear the excess being sung about and the glamour of the music videos and seek to attain them. These entertainers set trends and have a large influence on culture. They make millions of dollars selling their music to people and must be responsible to ensure that they are leaving positive impressions.

Some artists justify the toxic language that they use in their songs by performing service and giving back to the community. Rappers like Ludacris and TI have set up foundations that give back to the Atlanta community and help children. Yet for all the money, clothes, or books they give out, these material things can never make up for the psychological damage these rappers do to the community with their music. While their foundations might be preaching a message to "stay in school" their music is telling children to go out and sell drugs or engage in otherwise illegal behavior.

The treatment of women in today's music is also unacceptable. Women are degraded and characterized as inhuman. Black women especially bare the brunt of these negative lyrics. The perception of Black women as loose, promiscuous, and worthless is being perpetuated through these songs. Many places in the world that have never experienced Black women listen to this music and will treat Black female tourists accordingly. Black women traveling abroad frequently report being propositioned and sometimes attacked because of the assumptions generated by this music. Rap and hip hop are telling the world to devalue Black women.

Responsibility is the key to addressing this issue. Artists can no longer be guided by the top dollar alone. Their actions are detrimental to the community as a whole. Even people who do not listen to rap or hip hop are facing the consequences of the language used. It is time for blame shifting and finger pointing to end. Artists should own up to their part in the deconstruction of the Black community and change the messages that they communicate through their music.

Interracial Dating

By Jessica Gibbs

Last Friday, the topic of interracial dating was brought up in class. Generally speaking, there is some type of stigma associated with interracial dating in the African-American community. Whether it involves a black male with a Caucasian female or vice versa, there will always be people who oppose the idea of dating outside of one's race. But race is an aspect of a person that he/she can not control, like age. To eliminate racial tensions and achieve personal happiness, interracial dating should be accepted in all forms and fashions.

People should not eliminate possible future mates solely because the color of their skin. As an infant, that child did not have a say in the race of his or her parents. Not giving someone a chance, or disapproving of another relationship because of the race of a person is nothing more than a modern version of prejudice or pre-judging. Many times people feel that because an African-American male is dating a Caucasian women that he is turning his back on the women of his race. I can not count the amount of times I've heard the argument that " there's so few available black men in the world and these white women are taking them all for themselves". In both of these views on this relationship, the accuser is automatically judging the character of either the African-American man or the Caucasian woman. *However I must acknowledge that there are also some people involved in interracial relationships who are guilty of slight prejudice as well. Using the example above, let's say an African-American male was dating a Caucasian female for show (i.e. because he believed she was "easier" than a black woman, gave less attitude , or something equally stereotypically of women in general).*

Apart from relieving racial tensions, interracial relationships should be accepted because the persons involved are seeking personal happiness. There might be outstanding qualities in a member of the opposite race that one is seeking in a soul mate. Why should a person sacrifice such a genuine connection just because his or her partner belongs to another race? If one has ever seen the movie "Something New" starring Sanaa Lathan, he or she could attest to the realness of the predicament "Kenya" (Sanaa Lathan) found herself in. She is a college- educated, successful, professional woman looking for someone to complement her. However, it seemed as if all the men she encountered (African-American) did not meet her personal criteria. After " letting go and letting [it] flow", a new phrase for finding love between Kenya and her friends, Kenya found herself dating a Caucasian landscaper. He was not rich. He was not black, but he made her happy. He brought out Kenya's suppressed side ( including her choice in hairstyle, style in her apartment, and certainly shortened her list of things she "doesn't" do). Once the outside pressure and opinions of her new boyfriend finally took a toll on their relationship, Kenya found herself dating a black man who exceeded her expectations in a mate, (the drop dead
gorgeous) Blair Underwood. Unfortunately Blair does not make Kenya as happy as Brian did, so she ends back up with the man who truly has her heart, despite his color (or lack thereof).

If interracial dating is accepted, it should be accepted in all forms and fashions. I do not understand how one can accept the courtship of a black woman and white man but totally oppose a black man dating a white woman or the other way around. Love is not restricted to any color, size, of shape. So why should the finding the person to reciprocate these feelings of love be restricted to a specific race? I personally have "talked" to a Caucasian male before simply because he was attractive and to get to know him better. If a person only experiences one type/
race of prospective mates, he or she may miss out on a great opportunity to form an authentic love connection. Although there was clearly no love connection, I am not close minded to dating outside of my race. As students at Spelman and Morehouse College, we are constantly encouraged to leave with our degrees and a "Spel-house" relationship, but let's be open-minded to different experiences.

Apathetic Generation: Who's to Blame Response by Raisa Tuzo

While I did find Charise comments interesting, and can completely relate to the conversation she had with her grandmother and her grandmother’s best friend, I do not believe this is we are an apathetic generation. Instead, I believe we are a generation MISEDUCATED from birth. An important thing to keep in mind while reading her article is that she was conversing with people from 2 generations before ours. 2 people from a generation rather different from ours, raised during much different times from ours, and a generation that struggles to find ways in which they can relate to much of the things our generations consist of technologically, politically or ideologically. I can agree that our generations don’t care about the same things, but to say that this generation doesn’t care at all is rather farfetched.

True say, we haven’t had the equivalent of the Million Man March or participated in as many sit-ins, mainly because we are of the generations that reap the benefits of what past generations fought for. The problems they faced, and the problems we face are very different types of problems. Should our generation march in honor of parents that work 2-3 jobs to keep single parent homes above poverty? Should we march for children orphaned, abused or neglected by their doped out parents? Should we march for ignorant people that are raised to know nothing but Dolce & Gabbana or Botox while others die daily from starvation? Should we march because the education systems found in Black communities don’t teach us things we need to know or supply us with tools we need to succeed? Should we march because Spelman cost $30,000+ and most struggle to afford it? The marching would never end… Am I saying don’t march? No! But do we deserve to be ridiculed because we haven’t marched? No! Especially since our history books rob us of any in-depth knowledge about such subjects.

We are the generation Miseducated, preceded by generations either miseducated like us, or uneducated altogether and we have somehow earned labels like generation “X” or the apathetic generation when it’s not our fault. It’s one thing to be allowed no access at all to equal education than allowed access to a system that you don’t know is miseducating you. Society has changed, societal constructs have changed, morals have been changed and/or been lost and the general focus of society today is a different one from “back in the day”. Images of racial segregation, the holocaust or world wars have been replaced by images of life when you’re rich and/or famous and Soulja Boy’s and Weezy’s have replaced Marvin Gaye’s and Al Green’s. We are simply not dealing with the same things anymore. We weren’t born this way; we learned to be this way. When society paints the picture that its more important to be rich, than equal, this is what happens. When we have learned to be selfish, instead of selfless than this is what happens. When the principle of being “my brother’s keeper” is no longer taught or seen, this is what happens. If we are not taught to do so, we won’t do it. If all I see is sex, drugs and money, than that is all I will know. Is it my fault that this is what now plagues our environments? No. When the pursuit of equality has been replaced by the pursuit of personal riches, what should anyone expect?

We’ve become the spoiled generation if anything, not apathetic. We care, just about completely different things than generations before us thanks to those same generations. We’re the generation where more negativity is heard about it, than positivity. If all we hear is that we are lost causes, doomed, misguided, ungrateful and dysfunctional what does anybody really expect? If 50% of young voters weren’t taught to value their voice, themselves or their vote, why would they care enough to vote? If they have learned systems are designed against them, and nobody tells them anything in the contrary, why would they be voting? If anything, we are the generation FAILED, because they forgot that morals are not innate but learned. It’s so easy for grandmothers, and great grandfathers to say what is wrong with our generation. My question is, what was wrong with theirs that has resulted in us being this way?

Response: "The After Effect" by S. Childs

I agree that, if elected, Barack Obama will be closely examined, critiqued, and outright dismissed by some, mostly because of his racial background. However, these people are unlikely to vote for him next month anyway. 

We must also look at the changing demographics of America. Currently, minority populations are growing at a faster rate than that of the general population. Our census bureau predicts that by 2050, racial & ethnic minorities will comprise nearly half of the population. In the future, perhaps the progress of African Americans will no longer be so dependent on the approval of one group of people, as it has been for generations now. 

Unfortunately, racism is an irrational, unpredictable phenomenon. In all endeavors, there is almost always some type of risk involved.  In addition to the normal risks involved in significant undertakings, history has shown us (as African Americans) that we also risk being subjected to racism, as a reaction to our often feared aspirations.

These risks, however, must not overshadow our optimism. After all, this spirit of optimism has lead great leaders of movements to defeat injustice, namely, the civil rights movement. Electing Barack Obama as the first black president is well worth the risk. 

The After Effect....

By Maame'yaa


Whenever I am around my parents or their friends I am often posed with the question… “What do you think of the election?” Initially it was exciting to discuss the prospect of an African American man being the President of the United States of America until one summer evening. My parents had a group of friends over for dinner and we began to discuss the election. Only one of our guests voiced an opinion that did no support Barack Obama. She said that she was uneasy about the potential election of Obama because if he “Did not do everything perfect, he would ruin the credibility of any black man to come.” I thought this argument to be a little bit extreme. Although, when I actually sat and thought about it, my parent’s friend may not have been to far off.
There is a very real possibility that if Barack Obama becomes our president, his every move will be recorded with greater detail and criticized at a level that no other president before has had to endure. In this time where history IS happening, how often does our optimism overshadow the possibility that electing a black president could be detrimental to progress for African Americans rather than beneficial?

maforo.

Apathetic Generation; Who's to Blame?

By: Charise Patterson

I was having a conversation with my grandmother and her best friend, Rose, a few weeks ago. Rose described our generation as 'entirely too apathetic'. This statement sprung into a somewhat heated conversation in which I was obviously defending our generation whom often gets a lot of slack from elders for not caring enough and not doing enough. Maybe we haven't had the equivalent of the Million Man March nor have we participated in as many sit-ins and rallies, but I still believe we do our part.

Each argument I spat out, Rose shot down. I began to think this whole 'apathy' concept may not apply to all but it does seem to fit the majority. When concerning the AUC, I can undoubtedly say there were more people at the homecoming concert than nearly all of the Jena 6 rallies combined. This is a problem. From voting rights to civil rights our generation seems so much more apathetic and passive than those before us. Yes, the whole 'Vote or Die' and 'BaRack the Vote' slogans are cute. But the reality is there are about 44 million eligible young voters meaning between ages 18-29. Only 20 million voted in the 2004 election, that is half. What's wrong with the other half? (according to http://www.rockthevote.com/about/about-young-voters/who-are-young-voters/) When considering all of this information, I can't help but fold into the argument that our generation is apathetic and cares less about important issues, especially when compared to generations before us.

After having this conversation with Rose, the question 'why' came to mind. Why doesn't our generation care, and if we do, why don't we show it. I believe it is because so many things are handed to us. Sad as it is, most of us are spoiled in one way or another. I may have a had a nice minimum wage part-time job in high school, but anything I needed and most of what I wanted came from one source: parents. I can say the same for most of my friends. I never had to fight to eat the same restaurants as my white counterparts, I simply drive to the nearest McDonald's in the car that my parents bought for me. I complain when I have to walk more than a few blocks while my parents walked 20 block a day to school in Buffalo, New York.

Though our generation may be so called 'apathetic' and the shoe does fit, our parents and grandparents definitely deserve much of the blame. Hard work and dedication are values that many elders say we lack, but they fail to realize that these are values that must be learned through actual experiences. They don't just magically sink in from the constant repetition of stories from the old days.

Nevertheless, there are many of us who do care about making a change in the world and do take action when seen fit. But the harsh reality is, the majority of our generation is very apathetic compared to those before us and ironically those before us are the ones to blame.

The Right Choice

by K.Haley


Living a healthy life is very desirable, but how can one go about doing so in college? There is the common warning about the “Freshman 15,” which happens to be true! Coming to college I gained about 10lbs my first year! That was such a shock. Coming from a highly physically active life and having access to healthy food on a regular basis, to the breakdown in regimen at Spelman College impacted the way in which my body functioned. Our bodies work as highly specialized functioning machines, and something so slight as a diet change could knock you off balance. The illustrious institution of Spelman College, claims they are striving for a healthy campus, but they do not focus on the health of their students. What actions are they talking better the student body physically? I know we are a Division III school, but our athletics department is not up to par of that of Agnes Scott! Our cafeteria offers a variety of foods, but most are high in sodium and complex carbs.

One does not have to be a health freak to realize that the food in the Spelman Cafeteria is not the best for your body. With the “too salty” taste that lingers on your tongue and the urge to use the bathroom, how can that be healthy? Trying to find the balance between foods that taste good, and those that are good for you can be difficult. But, if there is only one choice, the healthy choice, there is no problem. Staples of Spelman’s cafeteria are a salad bar, fried foods, pasta, pizza and dessert. How healthy is that? Ok, they do have a small, quarter-size refrigerator, all the way in the back of the cafeteria, devoted to the vegans and vegetarians, but that’s not enough. Also, depending on where you live on campus, eating healthy from your dorm is limited. The regulations on having personal refrigerators hinder most from consuming healthy and fresh foods outside of the cafeteria. Also, buying food is expensive, we are college students! Spelman is a college of free thinking woman who are often served the meals of ignorant eaters.

We come to college and learn all about our majors and minors but fail to learn the importance of eating right and being physically active. A part from eating right, there is a physical aspect of healthy living. It is essential to exercise, for your heart and well-being. Yet physical activity is not too popular on our campus. The athletics department is one of the smallest buildings on college grounds. Does that speak to you about its importance on our campus? I think so! I will commend the Athletic department for creating the “wellness center” which provides dieting and exercising guidance to students, that is a great initiative. But, the lack of access to the workout room during the day is ridiculous. One has to figure out what random time the center will be open so they can get their work-out on, it shouldn’t be that difficult. The athletics at Spelman are literally invisible. Yes, we are an all woman institution, but I believe we are still competitive. Student athletes are proven to perform better academically, as sports provide a sense of balance to their life, yet such a small percentage of our student body is involved in sports.

I’m personally tired of paying for 3 meals a day, and leaving the cafeteria hungry, because there was “nothing” to eat. As an institution Spelman should be promoting healthy living, both physically and mentally. I feel that having healthy students is just as important as having educated ones. Obesity is an ever growing problem on this campus, and the only way to fight it is to enforce healthier living standards. Many said coming to Spelman College has been the right choice, but was it the healthy choice?


...REALLY?




Response - A. Pruitt

Living healthy is very desirable. However, so is making a 4.0. Both can be obtained but take the necessary actions for achievement. Coming to college is an obstacle in trying to maintain healthy lifestyles. However, college is just an obstacle it is not a dead end. Therefore, I would not use college as an excuse for a lack of perseverance and determination.

Spleman has progressed in their endeavors of striving for a healthier campus. However, rarely do people take advantages of many of the services they provide. Read Hall, a building that is usually only frequented by first year students taking their required physical education classes or student athletes, offers a variety of programs targeted to physical activity. As both an athlete at Spelman and an active person, I consider attacking Spelman’s collegiate sports programs and their efforts to provide healthy activities is fallacious. “Freshman 15” is a choice. My freshman year of college I lost fifteen pounds as a result of Spelman's gym and partaking in Spelman athletics. As a freshman I was both broke and without transportation, therefore I ate in the cafeteria. Although the food in the cafeteria is not the best, the cafeteria does provide choices. If students can frequent the pizza and hamburger line they can also frequent the salad bar, sandwich line and stir fry line. Again these are simply choices.

Additionally, Spelman does not put great emphasis on athletics and the times offered in the Wellness center may be inconvenient. However, who is to say that physical activity is limited to the walls of just one building. I recall many days, nights, evenings running around the oval and running at Morehouse’s track. These locations do not have strict hours. The simple desire to stay healthy is not enough to stimulate the drive that it takes to achieve a healthy lifestyle.

Spelman teaches us to be free thinking women. Our classes stress the importance of critical thinking, and teach us to be women who think out the box. These analytical strengths should be used in all aspects of life. Therefore, if you go to the cafeteria spice up your salad, add some lean meat and vinaigrette, take a brisk walk around the AUC instead of using the limited Wellness center hours as an excuse, and most of all have the determination to strive for what you want. If healthy living is what you aspire, then take the necessary actions to see it happen.

Relationships in the AUC- Commentary by A. Pruitt

The college experience is one of kind. In college students learn about themselves, cultivate their dreams and most of all make lasting relationships. Upon arriving in college the mass pool of new and interesting people is almost overwhelming. Additionally, dating, always an interesting topic of discussion concerning college students is an area of exploration. College students often play the field in an effort to mingle and meet new people. As students mature through college the idea of dating multiple people often becomes mundane, and college men and women get into committed relationships. Ideally, most people would like to meet their future husband or wives in college. However, depending upon the setting, sustaining a committed relationship in college could be a difficult task.

The Atlanta University Center is especially a unique college setting. The schools that make up the AUC in particular Spelman, Clark Atlanta University and Morehouse, although populated with over thousands of people have very close knit relationships. In regards to networking, these relationships are ideal. However, when it comes to personal intimate relationships the familiarity of students within the AUC can become a problem.

First, relationships in the AUC often do not work because everyone knows everyone. In college the most successful relationships are those that stray away public attention. However, this is almost impossible with networks such as Myspace, Facebook and the many interactive networks of people from various schools. Couples can usually only maintain a low key status about a relationship for only so long until someone who happens to know the two of them puts their business on display.

Another set up for disaster is the availability of mates. Although the combined population of the schools is massive, the odds of a person dating someone who their friend or associate has not dated are usually slim to known. Again, familiarity becomes a major problem.

Additionally, there is a high rate of STDs and AIDs in the AUC. This is definitely an issue when trying to choose a mate. You cannot look at someone and tell if they have either, and many college students are reluctant to get tested. The facts concerning this issue often deter students from pursuing relationship with student as the respective colleges.

Overall, maintaining a relationship in the AUC is by far a difficult task one that I would not recommend for the aforementioned reasons. If a student in the AUC, and your dream was to marry out of college I suggest that you find your potential mate at another institution outside the Atlanta University Center

Response by Blkadonis
It goes without saying that having a relationship and maintaining one that involves open lines of communication and trust comes with its challenges and benefits. However, I would be very careful to suggest individuals find their mates outside of the AUC when a number of "healthy" marriages today started here.

In reference to VergeN's initial point of familiarity, although there is a large student population here within the AUC, this setting does not add to the claim that "everyone knows everyone." In fact, it speaks more to the diversity of the area. Also, it is a bit naive to suggest that facebook and myspace play a role in destroying relationships. Those in relationships should opt to control what information is accessible on these sites or opt to not be an active member of the site. Albeit some information has leaked via facebook feed, photo albums and other applications; it does not negate the issue at hand. Simply put, those involved in relationships should take proactive steps to make all information on their respective accounts secure and TRUTHFUL!!

Moreover, the availability of mates within the AUC is an argument which should speak more to the ratio of male to females rather than the meticulousness of certain individuals. For instance, it's a known fact that there are more females than males here in the AUC. And at best, this argument is counterproductive to the writer's first claim that "everyone knows everyone." I, personally, do not know everyone. Therefore, everyone does not know eveyone.

Finally, I do agree that there is a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS and other STDs here in the AUC. I also agree that this is a factor in determining one's partner. This claim assumes that "sexual relations" is involved in these relationships, almost as if it is a precondition to getting to know someone. This simply is not the case.

I have always been ever the champion for finding a mate that respects and cares for you unconditionally. One may find one's "soul mate" here in the AUC. The problem comes when persons bring "baggage" into new relationships and thereby hinder progress towards a "healthy relationship." Relationships are about open and honest dialogue, understanding of both party's background, and support. It is the 80/20 theory. We each must decide what 20% we can live without in the other person. The 80% is what keeps a relationship going. One does not have to search outside of the AUC to find someone to meet them on these levels. In fact, the AUC is a vast ocean of exemplary individuals who each would make great mates.